Fraud
Nov 11, 2024
Which tools are essential for stopping credit application fraud? Explore proven solutions to enhance security and achieve real-time fraud prevention.
With digital fraud tactics evolving faster than ever, financial institutions need a cutting-edge solution to stay one step ahead. Credolab's new fraud signals and alerts, powered by device and behavioural biometric data, continuously analyse activity to provide early warnings of potential risks. This enables financial and non-financial institutions to respond swiftly to sophisticated and ever-changing fraud tactics before permanent damage occurs.
To understand better, let’s recap the difference between fraud signals, fraud alerts and fraud rules below:
1. Fraud Signal:
A fraud signal suggests a specific data point or pattern indicating potential fraudulent activity. It is a raw indicator, often subtle or isolated that something suspicious might happen. Fraud signals are detected through advanced data analytics involving a multi-layered approach and multiple data sources, including device and behavioural biometrics metadata.
2. Fraud Alert:
A fraud alert is the next level of escalation. It occurs when multiple fraud signals or a single high-risk signal reaches a threshold that triggers a formal notification. A fraud alert warns that the system has detected potential fraud based on predefined criteria. Fraud alerts are actionable and typically require further investigation.
3. Fraud Rule:
A fraud rule is a predetermined logic or criteria defining how fraud signals and alerts are handled within a banking digital onboarding or loan origination system. The framework governs when and how fraud signals are escalated into alerts or result in actions like denying a credit application. Fraud rules are usually customised based on a financial institution’s risk tolerance, credit product, and specific fraud channel threats.
In this fraud cycle, fraud signals are data inputs, fraud alerts are escalated warnings based on those signals, and fraud rules govern the actions to be taken when alerts arise. This layered approach helps banks detect, prevent, and manage fraud more effectively.
Focusing on fraud alerts, each feature within Credolab’s set of fraud alerts targets specific risk factors associated with device or user behaviour. This blog focuses on Credolab’s new device manipulation alerts and the comprehensive view of fraud risks and threats they offer across user behaviour, device integrity, network usage, and application activities.
For high-risk processes such as digital onboarding and loan or credit card applications, Credolab’s real-time device fraud alerts are invaluable tools that enable clients to identify and address digital fraud in real time. By continuously monitoring these processes, fraud can be quickly identified and prevented, sending out early warnings of potential risks that ensure protection against evolving financial fraud threats.
Digital fraud continues to evolve, and increasingly sophisticated attempts continue to exploit current systems. Using Credolab's fraud alerts, you can fight off several common types of fraud that threaten customer trust and financial stability.
Credolab has developed a comprehensive set of fraud alerts to address these fraud types effectively. In this blog, we dive into eight essential fraud device manipulation alerts provided by Credolab that financial institutions can leverage to stay ahead of sophisticated fraud tactics:
With the rise of automated fraud schemes, device farms have become a growing threat. Fraudsters use these farms to mimic legitimate users on a massive scale, making it difficult for financial institutions to detect malicious activity.
Device farms enable fraudsters to coordinate multiple physical devices and mass accounts to simulate legitimate user behaviour while applying for loans in mass. Devices part of a farm are often connected and controlled centrally, plugged in and charging, and not moving.
A Device Farm refers to a large-scale collection of physical devices used for malicious purposes, such as conducting automated fraud, mass account creation, or large-scale bot attacks.
To understand the risks posed by device farm fraud, let’s explore some common scenarios where this tactic is used:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alert can help:
As financial institutions bolster their defences, fraudsters have turned to more sophisticated tactics, such as cloning apps and emulating devices, to bypass security measures and carry out large-scale attacks. These methods can lead to significant financial loss, data breaches, and reputational damage.
Cloning refers to creating duplicate applications to deceive users, where fraudsters create exact replicas of legitimate apps or devices to deceive users and systems. Emulation involves running software in virtual environments to mimic legitimate devices, bypassing security measures. These tactics can lead to account takeovers and synthetic identity fraud, making them particularly dangerous.
To understand the risks posed by cloning and emulation fraud, let’s explore some common scenarios where these tactics are used:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alerts help:
As digital fraud continues evolving, fraudsters increasingly tamper with device integrity to bypass security measures. By rooting devices, manipulating applications, or changing device identifiers, they can gain unauthorised access to financial systems, enabling large-scale fraud and potentially leading to significant financial losses and reputational damage for institutions.
Rooting or jailbreaking refers to removing software restrictions on devices, giving users (or fraudsters) full access to the system. Application manipulation involves modifying legitimate applications to behave unintendedly, potentially bypassing security controls. Device identifier changes include altering its unique identifier (like IMEI or MAC address) to mask its true identity, making it easier for fraudsters to evade detection.
To understand the risks posed by device tampering, let’s explore some common scenarios where device integrity is compromised:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alerts help:
As fraudsters increasingly turn to remote access tools and automated scripts, device and user security threats arise. These techniques allow large-scale fraud operations to be executed in seconds, making identifying and blocking such activities critical.
Remote access tools allow fraudsters to take control of devices remotely, often without the user’s consent, enabling them to perform unauthorised transactions or steal sensitive data. Automation scripts would allow attackers to scale their operations, automatically automating actions on a device or account without human intervention, such as account creation or transaction execution across multiple devices simultaneously. Together, these tools pose a significant threat to propagating fraud.
To understand the risks posed by remote and automated control fraud, let’s explore some common scenarios where these tactics are used:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alerts help:
As financial institutions strengthen their fraud detection measures, fraudsters increasingly turn to Proxy, TOR, and VPN networks and location spoofing to obscure their true locations, complicating the fraud detection process and enabling cross-border fraud.
Proxies, TOR, and VPN tools can mask a user’s real IP address and location, allowing them to appear to be accessing the internet from a different place. Location Spoofing refers to falsifying a device's location, often bypassing geographic restrictions or evading detection. Geography Mismatch occurs when there is a discrepancy between the expected and reported location of a user or device.
To understand the risks posed by network and location-based fraud, let’s explore some common scenarios where these tactics are used:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alerts help:
Anonymity tools such as disposable emails and anonymous messengers have become key resources for fraudsters, allowing them to organise and execute large-scale attacks without revealing their identities or risking detection.
Anonymous Messengers refer to communication platforms, like anonymised messengers, that do not require user identification, making it difficult to trace users. Temporary Emails include disposable email addresses used temporarily to sign up for services, often without linking to a real identity. Non-market applications refer to apps downloaded from unofficial sources that might be modified or malicious, allowing fraudsters to install malware or steal credentials.
To understand the risks posed by anonymity and obfuscation in fraud, let’s explore some common scenarios where fraudsters employ these tools:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alerts help:
Fraudsters increasingly use non-market applications and suspicious surges in certain app categories to bypass security measures and execute fraudulent activities. Non-market applications refer to apps downloaded from sources other than official app stores. These apps often bypass standard security checks and may contain malware or malicious software. A Financial Application Installation Surge involves a sudden increase in the installation of financial apps on a device, which may signal the creation of fraudulent accounts. Gambling Application Usage is the presence of gambling apps on a user’s device, often associated with risky financial behaviour or potential money laundering activities.
To understand the risks posed by non-market applications and suspicious app usage, let’s explore some common scenarios where these tactics are used to commit fraud:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alerts help:
Fraudsters increasingly rely on new or reset devices to execute transactions that appear clean, without the digital history that would typically raise suspicion. Whether newly registered or recently reset, these devices allow fraudsters to evade detection systems by appearing as legitimate users.
New Device Usage involves financial transactions from a newly registered or recognised device, which fraudsters often use to make transactions look legitimate. Empty Device Usage refers to a device that appears to have been recently reset or has minimal data, indicating it may be recently set up, showing minimal data or activity, making it challenging to trace fraudulent activity.
To understand the risks posed by new or reset device usage in fraud, let’s explore some common scenarios where fraudsters employ these tactics:
Here’s how Credolab’s fraud alerts help:
Financial and non-financial institutions can enhance their defences against sophisticated fraud attacks by leveraging fraud alerts built on device and behavioural biometrics data.
With the rapidly evolving fraud landscape, it is no surprise that fraudsters are becoming more sophisticated. They use various tactics to exploit vulnerabilities in financial systems, from device farms and remote access tools to location spoofing and non-market applications. Fraudsters are constantly finding new ways to bypass traditional security measures.
What is the ideal solution to combating fraud? Investing in a sophisticated counter such as Credolab’s fraud alerts.
Credolab’s fraud alerts, powered by advanced devices and behavioural biometrics, provide a comprehensive defence against these diverse fraud types. By monitoring device integrity, usage patterns, network activity, and application behaviour in real time, Credolab offers early warnings that help detect and prevent fraud. With tailored solutions for detecting new device usage, anonymous communications, and geography mismatches, Credolab enables businesses to safeguard their operations and maintain customer trust.
Interested in learning how our products can help you? Request a free demo, or drop us your questions here.
Access data-driven insights & scores across our three solutions - Reduce Cost of Risk | Eliminate Fraud | Improve Marketing. Make better decisions with Credolab today!
Learn more about Credolab's products and solutions with our features through our Blog section, and feel free to share our content with your team!